| sci70047's profileTwist of LemonPhotosBlogLists | Help |
|
November 06 Businesses here turn blind eye to energy conservationThe Straits Times
6 November 2009, Online Forum
SINGAPORE is a paradox when it comes to temperatures. My foreign friends never fail to remark how we are 'summer outside, winter inside'. This overuse of air-conditioning indoors continues despite efforts by the authorities to advise on suitable temperatures for air-conditioning. Our need for temperature balance is indeed unique. In fact, extensive air-conditioning, which once reflected a sophisticated office culture, is now widespread. We carelessly leave doors to air-conditioned spaces open, at the expense of the building management. We design shops without effective mechanisms to reduce the amount of cold air escaping. It is ironic to see kitchens in shopping malls enjoying air-conditioning, while turning up the heat to cook. The worst example was a branded convenience shop chain in the heartland designed with its freezer right next to its open doors. While we try to persuade individuals to conserve energy by reducing electricity consumption, businesses have been left to waste energy and pass on higher costs to their customers. Their enormous consumption of electricity puts stress on the infrastructure and resources used to generate electricity. This translates to higher power bills for households too. I hope the Building and Construction Authority will work on guidelines to ensure that businesses conserve energy in the aftermath of the economic downturn. Ong Lip Hua July 16 RCs, not CCs, hold the keyThe Straits Times
Thursday, 16 July 2009, Forum
I APPLAUD Minister in the Prime Minister's Office and People's Association (PA) deputy chairman Lim Boon Heng for urging the PA to do more to help forge a common identity among Singaporeans ('PA's task ahead: To bridge society's gaps', Monday). Singapore has changed dramatically in the 40 years since the PA was set up to serve as a catalyst in engaging Singaporeans. The emphasis today is on a self-possessed drive to develop and excel - from finding a good preschool programme and competing for enrolment into preferred primary schools to competing even harder for jobs. This intensity to achieve and excel has severely reduced Singaporeans' time for meaningful interaction with fellow citizens. The PA's community centres (CCs) and clubs, which used to be oases of relaxation and congregation, are now as caught up in the same, intense drive to adapt to swift-morphing technologies and lifestyle preferences. To keep itself relevant to its neighbourhood, distance is equally important now because of time constraints. So the PA should, perhaps, relook the role of residents' committees (RCs) in encouraging engagement and congregation within a community. The HDB building strategy involves constructing blocks of flats clustered close together. So, it may be more practical and convenient to build more and larger RCs where they are usually located - at the void decks of HDB flats - offering the full range of facilities that CCs have, which residents can access easily. Such a new and more complete infrastructure will allow grassroots leaders and residents more opportunities to interact. The RCs will be cheaper to maintain as they will still be smaller than the CCs, quicker and more flexible in responding to residents' needs and, hence, attract and retain more active members. Residents will also feel less alienated should election boundaries be redrawn. And it will feel less strange and unfamiliar for a resident to walk over or just ride down in a lift to his RC than to the CC, which may be located - and belong - to a different constituency. Improving, increasing and enlarging RCs may diminish the role of CCs, or ultimately render them obsolete, but the price may be worth paying if it keeps the PA thriving and relevant. Ong Lip Hua June 05 Clinics can link up to offer 24-hour helpTHE STRAITS TIMES
3 APRIL 2009 FORUM
http://www.straitstimes.com/ST%2BForum/Story/STIStory_357963.html
I APPLAUD Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan's moves in recent years to reduce the stress on our health-care system. The initiatives have included publishing the rates of procedures, reducing waiting time at polyclinics and, more recently, increasing hospital bed space and increasing opportunities for medical training.
Given that the nation seeks to boost its population and is actively pursuing medical tourism - and considering the higher stress facing our population from the ever-increasing cost of living - our health-care delivery systems need a relook. Instead of centralised systems, which lead to longer waiting times and increased costs at public hospitals, we could encourage neighbourhood clinics to team up to form 24-hour operations with larger capacities.
This should take some stress away from accident and emergency departments.
Subsidies can also be provided for clinics teaming up to form local hospitals with bed space.
Hospitalisation nearer homes helps ease traffic congestion while the shortened travel distances will encourage family visitations, which should help patients recover.
The Ministry of Health can learn new ways of operations from private practices and, in so doing, improve the systems used by public health-care providers.
Larger private practices will also have more bargaining power over rental clauses to pass the cost savings back to patients. However, we will need many more doctors to support the population's needs. I support increasing medical training facilities and posts to ensure that while Singapore grows, we will not be penalised by a lack of medical support.
Ong Lip Hua February 10 Impossible GlobalisationThe world is turning protectionistic. Suddenly, it was an awakening. Strangely, though it has been in the writing for a long time. It was most painfully written in Obama's election promises. And the world was cheering him on. It was right in our face when corporate America gave the executive more than what he deserved. Now we blame them for our bad parenting. It was brightly lit when the world dissed China for her tough one-child policy. Now we have too many people and too little work. Now we are all suddenly upset that America wants to save itself, close its doors for some redefining, reduce its borrowings and slim down after years of obesity. Because we have been feeding this obese obsession. Because we have been lending them money to pay for our work. Because we have been rushing into this blackhole of consumption, the sudden overwhelming surge of magnetic forces in this overweight center causing the blackhole to finally break up and sprew everyone out, is too disorientating. We can no longer believe in hegemony. Regionisation is a bad word. Autonomy to re-organise our production, consumption patterns prove too much to percieve and accept. Protectionist America is good. It is the finale to herald in "change" where the world produces not for one center, but the real hegemony of needs. Where globalisation goes into first phase, where demand and supply is balanced. It has been bewildering that we have been vocalising globalisation based on a singular consumer, multipule supplier model. Even when we add China and India, a total of more than 2 billion population into the supplier side economics. Strangely, no world reknown economists has noticed such a huge statistic, a major tsunami among the ripples of empricial data. Globalisation requires an almost equal amount of consumers as suppliers. Or at least not just one or an extreme small number of consumers with an disproportionately high number of suppliers. The closing up of the American market will enforce all other countries to develop their own domestic market, or seek a co-operative regional market. This can only mean well for globalisation. Success of globalisation requires consumers, as well as suppliers. Only with regional consumption centers in every part of the world, can there be business for suppliers. Not the cheap labour and ever lower costs which do not generate consumer markets. These benefit only the corporates, who now face their own undoing of depending on only an almost singular consumer market. Let there be "Buy American" and "Hire American". The world needs to wake up to real costs, real wages and sustainable consumption. December 03 The currency of Asia's riseAmerican reports suggests that America's influence will wane. Asian leaders concur that Asia will rise to occupy a fair amount of vacated American influence. China and India are keenly watched as the next movers.
I am not as optimistic.
As an economics trained person, I see the world divided into 2 halves. The consumers and the producers. The fine division between both, is the value of currencies. Dollars and cents.
America, Western Europe are the main consumers. Their currencies are strong compared to Asian ones, who are suppliers. Arabs are also suppliers with a weaker currency.
The consumers will always dictate and influence world policies. They have the buying power. And they can afford to work less, produce less tangible goods and think of more value-add services to earn.
The suppliers will always be at the mercy of consumers. They produce most of the tangible items, compete amongst themselves to sell ever cheaper and produce as more efficiently to pander to the demands and new standards of the consumers.
Asians are not used to the idea of working less. In fact, working hard is a much touted virtue. Working smart, is very much unheard of. And with a larger population to take care of, a strong currency policy is hard to follow. There are no empirical data and case studies for strong currency policies for countries managing populations of 1 billion.
Until Asia understand the fundamentals of a strong currency, and finds value in people, massively, Asia will stay as suppliers. Asia will compete with Asia to produce and sell their hard work to America and Europe.
Until Asia is able to deal with and implement strong currencies, Asia, will not rise. October 03 Bailout: Impacts on AsiaUS Bailout: Impacts on Asia
The world's financial systems are holding their breath on the outcome of the vote for the great US bailout. Stock markets across the world are trading on the "Ayes" and "Nays" of the USA government.
The bailout, it seems, limited only to stocks and shares when discussed outside of USA. While the USA battle is marked by the common American (main street) against the Wall street.
The bailout consisted mainly of printing money, or increasing money supply (USD) to cushion the credit crunch. The USA government will use this "new" money to buy over the bad loans from the banks so they have funds to continue with business, instead of massive writedowns, and eventual closure.
The main street is angry for having to pay for the Wall street's expensive failures, and apprehensive about a massive inflation caused by the extra cash. It may also potentially drop the value of the USD, causing lower Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) for the main street.
The credit crunch does not seem to be much of the world's concern, other than inter-bank holdings and contract businesses. A slow USA economy also means a slow world economy, as USA is the main consumer of the world's produce.
However, most of us have been distracted from the fact that being the world's largest consumer, it means almost everything, especially oil, is priced exclusively in USD. A low USD means a fall in real value of the contracts signed in USD. This will cause many forward prices to jump accordingly, even without an increase in consumption.
A spike in oil price looks to be in the making. First, to reflect the drop in the value of the USD, nominal value of oil will go up. This means inflation, for the rest of the world. Second, when stocks and shares go down, investors, fund managers, common man will hold cash, gold and oil as alternatives. This is a shift in funds from the stock market, to the oil contracts. The spiked demand for oil, will further inflate oil prices, in the short term.
With little policable minimum wage policies, Asian countries will see rising prices. Employers now faced with the credit crunch, high materials costs, have little retreat but seek to use wage to balance the book. This potentially creates a recipe for massive stagflation for Asia.
Without careful thought on how to excerise the huge bailout plan, USA may find itself again as the epicenter of a massive economic chaos, due to the USD being the currency of the world. The result may be a herculean task for the USA foreign service trying to balance a wonderful opportunity for Russia to step in as the counterweight in a world distraught at USA policies.
The bailout plan may seem to be mainly an American issue. But Asia, and Russian superpower dreams wait in the wings. October 02 Vote No for Wall Street BailoutMy perspective, in very simple illustration: A man earning $1 a month wants to buy a cup worth $2. He applies to the bank for a loan for $1.50. The bank in its greed for more interest collection, values the cup at $20 and extends a loan of $20 to the man. The interest rate is pegged to 0.1% for the first 3 years. The man happily takes the extra money. After 3 years, the bank revises the interest rate to 10%. The man is unable to service his loan anymore. The bank gets the cup. Due to massive cup sales this way, the oversupply of cups causes the cup value to become $0.20 now. The bailout means, the Government buys the cup from the bank. Now, the bank will NOT quote $0.20 or even $2 for the cup to the Government. These bankers will tell the Government, it is worth $50! This will cause long tedious negotiations, which will fail some banks in the meantime anyway. The Government will be forced to buy the cup at $25 eventually to end the long negotiations. The OVERPRICED cup will be a BAILOUT to the banks, who takes $5 more than the loan they gave out, and the economy is worse off, with inflation due to $0.20 cups priced at $25, paid for by taxpayers! September 17 The ERP ironySent to Straits Times Forum
17 September 2008
New transport price structure is an ERP irony
The new public transport fare structure provides a good rebate for transfers. This is an encouraging sign to reduce waiting time by shortening the bus routes to allow faster redeployment of each vehicle. This also means a higher frequency of bus arrivals.
Public buses have been subjected to the ERP earlier.
The objective of the ERP is to reduce traffic, hence, improve speeds along congested roads. This has seen certain success in improving road conditions in the Republic.
The ERP does not seem coherent with the new fare structure, and the greater bus service frequencies it seemed to want to achieve.
Also, the Public Transport Committee (PTC), which is established under the Ministry of Transport, and Land Transport Authorities (LTA) has a good set of service standards stated at http://www.ptc.gov.sg/services_standard.asp.
Point 4.4 of the PTC service standards webpage says "At least 80% of bus services to operate at headway of not more than 15 minutes (to be changed to 10 minutes with effect from Aug 2009) during weekday (excluding public holidays) peak periods, unless otherwise stipulated by the PTC."
This means that the ERP cannot reduce the traffic volume of the public buses due to the PTC regulations. The ERP however, punishes the public transportation operators by increasing their operating costs for service improvements in reducing waiting times while running counter objective of both the PTC service standards, and the new fare objectives. These additional costs are not necessary, and will instead be passed to the consumers of public transportation, with no real value-add nor service improvements.
ONG Lip Hua (MR) August 29 Like . LoveSent to The Straits Times on Friday, 29 August 2008 Like. Love In the midst of searching for the "right one", most of us seem to be fixated at "feelings" as the barometer of "love". Feelings are wonderful beings. They hold us up, and give us strength to brave seemingly impossible odds and uncertain destinies. Feelings are perceptions our "heart" decide due mostly to due to a myraid of chemical reactions contributed by our eyeballs, nostrils, ears, skin and tongue. Little can we control the manfestation of feelings, though to some extent, experience and perceptions may affect these wonderous beings. Feelings held many of us holding ideals and expectations beyond what we really are seeking. Feelings tell us how much we "like" someone. Enough to go out with this person on occasions, or give "love" a chance. Feelings also means that we can and will "like" many at the same time. We follow up on our "likes" to decide. We decide how much responsiblilties we wish to undertake towards each "like". We decide to "love". Decisions come with responsibilities. Love is a decision. It comes mostly with feelings, and it can come in the absense of. I hope many of us can choose to love, than to like love. Deciding to love gives us the constant security and solumn determination to rekindle feelings as they come and go with the chemical reactions in our bodies. I hope this will allow many of us to choose the right one, than to feel for one too many. August 24 Beneath the National FlagSaturday, 23 August 2008. A letter in the Straits Times rebutting that it is due to more foreigners who stay in the HDB flats resulting in less National Flags being hosted in HDB estates. Foreigners usually stay in condominums, and condominiums are fully flagged.
I take his last point that Singaporeans do not understand the trials of staying in foreign countries. That is probably why we are seeing less flags. The replacement rate of Singaporeans has been below 2 for about a decade. Singapore citizenship has increased from 2.8 (est) to 4 million in about a decade. That refers to an influx of many many new citizens, which is not a bad thing.
Comparing the pride and festive atmosphere in the 1980s, 1990s and now in the 2000, the difference, is stark. I still remember proudly salutely my flag, whenever I see one in 1980s and 1990s. In those days, it was very hard to get approval for displaying the National flag. There was a strong sense of belonging. Every Singaporean is proud to identify with each other. And Singaporeans are a very loving tribe. New guys get accepted, once you display your pink IC or red passport.
So what happened to our National flag?
It is not the foreigners' fault. They have no obligation to put up OUR flag. And no, not most foreigners live in condominums, foreign "talent" according to Singapore labour laws can be anyone employed as a CEO to someone who sweeps the floor and clears my tables. I don't need to take a snipe here, but this "talent" obviously has not understood our Singapore society enough, to draft a sensible letter to the papers.
And that is exactly the problem.
The sudden huge influx of new immigrants who no longer identify or celebrate "Singapore" as defined by the main body, find it hard to integrate. While the main body moves and hums along like woodwork, too systematic to understand how to communicate with the new additions.
This, on top of highly indiscriminate and too liberal issuing of labour passes to "talents".
"Singapore needs foreign talents, especially in areas like IT and finance where it is lacking." So commented an Indian national in the Sunday Times, 24 August 2008. And how does Singapore lack in IT and finance profesisonals? Let me just take for example, India. I met an Indian banking Director here on conference. I commented that India's banking and financial sector is too enclosed and off limits to foreigners. His answer is, that the entire India banking sector is worth about USD100 million. Liberalising it, will be a catastrophe of Indian banks being bought out in 15 minutes.
Protectionism, is not good. But if we do not ensure our people do not get sufficient opportunities at being exposed and trained in crucial sectors, obviously, we will never have enough "talents". Then we have to import "talents" from protectionist countries, whose "talents" may not necessary be as good as those we rejected, for lack of opportunities.
In his National Day rally this year, Prime Minister Lee said " ... many of us think foreigners are here to depress our wages, this is not so..." and about 10 minutes later, he continued with "... and we have to let them employ more foreigners, to help them cut costs..."
And a few days ago, the papers reported that Singapore had an increase of millionaires and billionaires.
Late one night before National Day, I heard strange sounds in the corridor. It was members of the Residents' Committee (RC) hanging flags along the corridor. I salute them for the hard work. I would have been among those who will not bother with the flag.
Why put up something, I can hardly relate to anymore? The Singaporean identity is so diluted, I can no longer define who I am, and why is it that I am so.
Maybe we do have to slow down some. Talk to each other, build the bond. Doesn't matter if there will only be 4 million Singaporeans 5 years later, still. What matters is, we will have 4 million people who will hang out the flags, with pride. |
||||
|
|